Copy only changed files #110

Open
opened 2016-03-11 07:24:22 -08:00 by slavafomin · 5 comments
slavafomin commented 2016-03-11 07:24:22 -08:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Hello!

I have a project with extremely big directories. It would be a tremendous improvement if wrench would be able to compare files from source and target directory using timestamp and/or filesize.

Thanks!

Hello! I have a project with extremely big directories. It would be a tremendous improvement if **wrench** would be able to compare files from source and target directory using timestamp and/or filesize. Thanks!
igorshubovych commented 2016-03-11 14:00:09 -08:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Being honest wrench was not updated for 2 years, because the project is looking for maintainer.

If I were you, I would implement this routine myself or find another solution.

Being honest `wrench` was not updated for 2 years, because the project is looking for maintainer. If I were you, I would implement this routine myself or find another solution.
ryanmcgrath commented 2016-03-11 22:56:33 -08:00 (Migrated from github.com)

^this pretty much. Was built as a stop gap for very early versions if Node, better libraries exist now. I only keep it available because for some reason an unholy amount of projects still list it as a dependency.

On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 2:00 PM -0800, "Igor Shubovych" notifications@github.com wrote:

Being honest wrench was not updated for 2 years, because the project is looking for maintainer.

If I were you, I would implement this routine myself or find another solution.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

^this pretty much. Was built as a stop gap for very early versions if Node, better libraries exist now. I only keep it available because for some reason an unholy amount of projects still list it as a dependency. On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 2:00 PM -0800, "Igor Shubovych" notifications@github.com wrote: Being honest wrench was not updated for 2 years, because the project is looking for maintainer. If I were you, I would implement this routine myself or find another solution. — Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
slavafomin commented 2016-03-12 02:29:07 -08:00 (Migrated from github.com)

I see, @ryanmcgrath , you should add a deprecation notice to the README and use https://docs.npmjs.com/cli/deprecate to notify the users during module installation then, I think. Maybe even add a link to the most suitable alternative.

I see, @ryanmcgrath , you should add a deprecation notice to the README and use https://docs.npmjs.com/cli/deprecate to notify the users during module installation then, I think. Maybe even add a link to the most suitable alternative.
ryanmcgrath commented 2016-03-12 04:31:41 -08:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Pull request it and I will? I'll likely forget due to a ridiculously packed schedule these days, but happy to push it up if so. Alternatively, if anyone wants to take over ownership of the library I'm happy to help facilitate this. I put out a call on Twitter some time ago seeing if anyone was interested but sadly found no takers.

On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 2:29 AM -0800, "Slava Fomin" notifications@github.com wrote:

I see, @ryanmcgrath , you should add a deprecation notice to the README and use https://docs.npmjs.com/cli/deprecate to notify the users during module installation then, I think. Maybe even add a link to the most suitable alternative.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

Pull request it and I will? I'll likely forget due to a ridiculously packed schedule these days, but happy to push it up if so. Alternatively, if anyone wants to take over ownership of the library I'm happy to help facilitate this. I put out a call on Twitter some time ago seeing if anyone was interested but sadly found no takers. On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 2:29 AM -0800, "Slava Fomin" notifications@github.com wrote: I see, @ryanmcgrath , you should add a deprecation notice to the README and use https://docs.npmjs.com/cli/deprecate to notify the users during module installation then, I think. Maybe even add a link to the most suitable alternative. — Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
slavafomin commented 2016-03-12 05:36:50 -08:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Yeah, I think all professional developers are pretty busy these days. A lot of work needs to be done )

Sent from myMail app for Android Saturday, 12 March 2016, 03:31PM +03:00 from Ryan McGrath < notifications@github.com> :

Pull request it and I will? I'll likely forget due to a ridiculously packed schedule these days, but happy to push it up if so. Alternatively, if anyone wants to take over ownership of the library I'm happy to help facilitate this. I put out a call on Twitter some time ago seeing if anyone was interested but sadly found no takers.

On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 2:29 AM -0800, "Slava Fomin" < notifications@github.com > wrote:

I see, @ryanmcgrath , you should add a deprecation notice to the README and use https://docs.npmjs.com/cli/deprecate to notify the users during module installation then, I think. Maybe even add a link to the most suitable alternative.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub .

## Yeah, I think all professional developers are pretty busy these days. A lot of work needs to be done ) Sent from myMail app for Android Saturday, 12 March 2016, 03:31PM +03:00 from Ryan McGrath < notifications@github.com> : > Pull request it and I will? I'll likely forget due to a ridiculously packed schedule these days, but happy to push it up if so. Alternatively, if anyone wants to take over ownership of the library I'm happy to help facilitate this. I put out a call on Twitter some time ago seeing if anyone was interested but sadly found no takers. > > On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 2:29 AM -0800, "Slava Fomin" < notifications@github.com > wrote: > > I see, @ryanmcgrath , you should add a deprecation notice to the README and use https://docs.npmjs.com/cli/deprecate to notify the users during module installation then, I think. Maybe even add a link to the most suitable alternative. > > — > Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub. > > — > Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub .
This repository is archived. You cannot comment on issues.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: code/wrench-js#110
No description provided.